Author: Gregory C. Jenks

  • Foolish generosity

    Foolish generosity

    [IMAGE: https://www.flickr.com/photos/jeepersmedia/49300487777%5D

    This post is part of the ON THE WAY sermon series at St Mark’s Anglican Church, Casino July/October 2022


    The Rich Fool.

    Well, we all know this story.

    It is a story about that self-centred, greedy person who hoarded every success and achievement in life, and did not share any of his success with other people.

    He was a creep.

    We are not like that. Thank God.

    At least, that is what we tell ourselves.

    Yet this parable speaks to us as people, as a nation, and as a church here in Casino.

    This morning, let’s focus on how it speaks to us as a parish.


    During the past week, Parish Council made a brave decision not to be like that ancient farmer.

    We have decided to reopen the OpShop.

    To do that we have agreed to lease the premises at 85 Walker St. Most recently that has been the NORTEC site. Now it will be St Mark’s Downtown.

    The Parish office will be there as well.

    And so will the priest.

    And the Churchwardens, as well as everyone who usually comes into the Parish office during the week.

    There will be Jesus people down there—in and out—every moment of every day.

    We shall all be downtown.

    Downtown.

    Not at the church, but in the Main Street.


    That is a scary choice.

    It may not work out.

    (But how well is the current plan working for us?)

    There are no guarantees of success.

    Rather than build a bigger barn here at St Mark’s, we are going to take our church down to the main street.

    We will create a place of welcome and hospitality.

    The OpShop will help our community recycle preloved goods. That is a great thing to do, in any case. We need to break the cycle of our disposable culture. An opShop helps those who need access to quality items at low cost. It avoids good stuff going into landfill.

    Stuff is able to be recycled.

    People are also able to be recycled. By love. By acceptance. By finding a safe place to talk. By love.

    St Mark’s Downtown will be that kind of place.

    We cannot guarantee it will work, but it is better than building bigger barns and keeping the treasure of God’s love for ourselves. For our friends. For people like us.


    Everyone time that someone feels safe coming into the new OpShop, God’s kingdom has come.

    Every time someone feels welcomed at St Mark’s Downtown, God’s kingdom has come.

    Every time someone opens their heart to another person, God’s kingdom has come.

    Everyone a volunteers enjoys the opportunity to make a difference, God’s kingdom has come.

    Every time that anyone feels valued in the space, God’s kingdom has come.

    Father,
    May your name be held holy.
    Your kingdom come.

  • Learning to pray, learning to live

    Learning to pray, learning to live

    [IMAGE: The Lord’s Prayer in many different languages at the Pater Noster Church in Jerusalem]

    This post is part of the ON THE WAY sermon series at St Mark’s Anglican Church, Casino July/October 2022


    No doubt we have all been surprised by different versions of the Lord’s Prayer at different times.

    RCs and Anglicans sometimes stop at different places.

    • Traditional version vs new translation, especially at funerals.
    • Then there was the in-between version used in AAPB
    • Today we have another version in Luke 11!

    Matthew

    The form of the Lord’s Prayer that we use in church is based on the version in Matthew 6, where the Lord’s Prayer sits at the very centre of the Sermon on the Mount (chapters 5 to 7). As Matthew conveys the teaching of Jesus for the disciples, this Prayer serves as the essence of discipleship. 

    This prayer tells us who we are, how we are to pray, and how we are to live.,

    But even then we do not quite say it how Matthew records it. We change the words at various points! That surely invites us to think about why that is so?

    As Matthew records it, the prayer goes like this:

    Our Father in heaven, 
    hallowed be your name. 
    Your kingdom come. 
    Your will be done, 
    on earth as it is in heaven. 
    Give us this day our daily bread. 
    And forgive us our debts, 
    as we also have forgiven our debtors. 
    And do not bring us to the time of trial, 
    but rescue us from the evil one.
    [Matthew 6:9–13]

    The Didache

    Our familiar versions are influenced by Didache 8:2:

    And do not pray as the wicked [do]; 
    pray instead this way, as the Lord directed in his gospel:

    Our Father who are in heaven: 
    May your name be acclaimed as holy,
    May your kingdom come.
    May your will come to pass on earth as it does in heaven.
    Give us today our daily bread,
    And cancel for us our debt,
    As we cancel [debts] for those who are indebted to us.
    And do not bring us into temptation,
    But preserve us from evil [or, from the evil one].
    For power and glory are yours forever.

    Pray this way thrice daily. [Niederwimmer, Hermeneia, 134]

    Luke

    Luke 11 offers us a third ancient version of the Lord’s Prayer. In the opinion of many scholars, the version in Luke is the more authentic:

    Father, 
    hallowed be your name. 
    Your kingdom come. 
    Give us each day our daily bread. 
    And forgive us our sins, for we ourselves forgive everyone indebted to us. 
    And do not bring us to the time of trial.

    The brevity and directness of this version supports the idea that we are very close to the words of Jesus here. 

    Over time, sacred texts acquire additional lines, but they rarely lose anything. They grow more complicated rather than become simpler as time passes.

    In any case, whether it is the most primitive version of our sacred prayer, it is Luke’s version that we are invited to reflect on this morning.


    Learning pray, learning to live prayerfully

    As part of our reflection process on these weeks when we walk to Jerusalem alongside Jesus, let’s Look at the Lord’s Prayer through the lens of discipleship. What does this prayer—and specifically this version of that prayer—teach us about what it means to be Jesus people here in Casino this year?

    We could take each line in Luke’s version, but even if I just spoke for (say) 2 minutes about each of those 6 lines, that would add 12 minutes to the length of this sermon!

    Instead of that, which would be very easy for me to do—except that I would probably need more than 2 minutes for all of those lines—let’s do it differently.

    Let me assign you some homework for this week: one line from the Lord’s Prayer for each day of the week. 

    MONDAY: Father

    • What does it mean that we can think of the love at the very heart of the cosmos as “Father”?
    • Is this true for everyone?

    TUESDAY: hallowed be your name. 

    • How do I “hallow” the name of God?
    • How does my life reflect the character of God, and how do the dynamics of our church community reflect the eternal love of Father, Son and Spirit.

    WEDNESDAY: Your kingdom come. 

    • Does my life look like God is in charge?
    • How do I make changes so that God’s will is done on earth as in heaven?

    THURSDAY: Give us each day our daily bread. 

    • Do I really trust God for each day as it comes?
    • How do I share any surplus to make other lives better?

    FRIDAY: And forgive us our sins, for we ourselves forgive everyone indebted to us. 

    • Do I really want God to forgive me my sins only to the same degree that I let go of every complaint and grudge I have ever about anyone else?
    • What if God treated me the way I treat everyone else?

    SATURDAY: And do not bring us to the time of trial.

    • Tough times always come, even though we wish they did not.
    • If we cannot avoid the bad patches, how does my faith help me survive them?

    Go well with those questions.

    As you fashion your answer to them you are shaping your own identity as a Jesus person here in Casino.

  • Martha and Mary

    Martha and Mary


    This post is part of the ON THE WAY sermon series at St Mark’s Anglican Church, Casino July/October 2022


    Another very familiar story as we walk to Jerusalem with Jesus.

    Again this week, we have a Gospel story that is unique to Luke: Martha and Mary.

    We note that Luke places it directly after the Samaritan story. That is an interesting juxtaposition. Luke is matching a story about men with a story about women, but he is also arranging his material to suit his clearly expressed agenda of providing faith formation material for his reader(s). Cf Luke 1:1–4

    For Luke, “an orderly account” does not mean “just the way it happened,” but rather, “how I want you to think about it!”

    Indeed, perhaps—as some commentaries suggest—the two stories offer a double unpacking of the Great Commandment to love God and love our neighbour. If the Samaritan is often seen as all about compassion action, then Martha & Mary are often seen as a counterbalance with a focus on stillness in the presence of God:

    Now as they went on their way, he entered a certain village, where a woman named Martha welcomed him into her home. She had a sister named Mary, who sat at the Lord’s feet and listened to what he was saying. But Martha was distracted by her many tasks; so she came to him and asked, “Lord, do you not care that my sister has left me to do all the work by myself? Tell her then to help me.” But the Lord answered her, “Martha, Martha, you are worried and distracted by many things; there is need of only one thing. Mary has chosen the better part, which will not be taken away from her.” [Luke 10:38–42]

    There are many things to note as we reflect on this familiar story:

    • Jesus continues on the way to Jerusalem
    • Martha and Mary are disciples who stay at home and do not follow on the way. In other words, there are different ways of saying YES to God.
    • Women disciples!
    • Household comprised of two sisters (families of different form). There is no male figure! Luke has relocated the scene from Bethany to make his point. John includes a brother, Lazarus, but the sisters still seem to be in charge. 
    • Martha is the hostess: she invites Jesus into her home.
    • Two women having a male guest (what will the neighbours say?) Another boundary crossed
    • Honour/shame culture means Jesus could not offer to help. Just as I am not allowed in the kitchen when visiting an Arab family. Do we need to cross every boundary? What boundaries do we choose not to cross?
    • Jesus did not offer to organise the meal! (Martha, just bring me a couple of fish and a bread roll. I will fix dinner!)
    • Do you not care …? (Cf storm on lake) “Teacher, do you not care that we are perishing?” [Mark 4:38] How we freak out when things do not go as we hope!

    In this story we see the tension between task and attitude, but we see it elsewhere in the Bible as well.

    There is the famous tension between faith and works in James

    What good is it, my brothers and sisters, if you say you have faith but do not have works? Can faith save you? If a brother or sister is naked and lacks daily food, and one of you says to them, “Go in peace; keep warm and eat your fill,” and yet you do not supply their bodily needs, what is the good of that? So faith by itself, if it has no works, is dead. But someone will say, “You have faith and I have works.” Show me your faith apart from your works, and I by my works will show you my faith. [James 2:14–18]

    And we might compare the classic passage in 1 Cor 13 – without love, good actions are pointless

    If I speak in the tongues of mortals and of angels, but do not have love, I am a noisy gong or a clanging cymbal. And if I have prophetic powers, and understand all mysteries and all knowledge, and if I have all faith, so as to remove mountains, but do not have love, I am nothing. If I give away all my possessions, and if I hand over my body so that I may boast, but do not have love, I gain nothing. [1 Corinthians 13:1–3]

    Of course, it is both, not either. Love without action is empty, and action without love is empty.

    Our mission is to love God and also to love people. Both. Always.

    Yesterday afternoon I was speaking with a friend from Jerusalem and I mentioned that today we have this gospel passage. Her immediate response was, “But I am both!”

    Indeed, and so we all are!

  • Anyone but them

    Anyone but them

    A sermon for St Mark’s Anglican Church, Casino on Sunday, 10 July 2022


    This post is part of the ON THE WAY sermon series at St Mark’s Anglican Church, Casino July/October 2022


    Last week as we started our journey to Jerusalem with Jesus, we focused on the significance of peace-making. We did not mention it at the time, but since then I have been conscious of the commendation found in Matthew’s version of the Beatitudes:

    Blessed are the peacemakers, for they will be called children of God. [Matthew 5:9]

    Today we get to explore another aspect of peacemaking as people who cross the boundaries that keep us apart, and overcome the fear that stifles our capacity to love.

    The parable that Jesus composes in response to a question from a religion scholar (scribe) is both familiar and very much alive in our culture today.

    We call the hero of this parable the Good Samaritan, but that adjective is never applied to the anonymous third passerby in Luke’s Gospel. He is simply “a Samaritan …”

    As an aside, this timeless spiritual classic is found only in Luke.

    One of the benefits of having four gospels in the New Testament is that we hear from different circles within the earliest Jesus movement, and not just a single account approved (and censored) by later church authorities.

    However, as essential background information, let’s note that for Jewish people in the time of Jesus there was no such thing as a “Good Samaritan.”

    All Samaritans—and every Samaritan—were discounted as a failed religious community. That is part of the essential cultural context for this classic story. Suffice to note that for Jews at the time, Samaritans were seen as the despised enemy.

    As the opening dialogue before the parable makes clear, this whole scene in Luke is about drawing boundaries: who is inside the circle of affection and who is beyond the circle of care.


    A traveller goes from Jerusalem to Jericho …

    That was a dangerous journey to make, and immediately Jesus set the scene for what will follow.

    The images on the screen this morning may give you some idea of what was involved for anyone making that journey in either direction. It was journey people made in groups, where possible. There was safety in numbers.

    [The following screenshots are from an excellent video from SatelliteBibleAtlas with aerial photography of the ancient route from Jericho to Jerusalem. In the parable, the victim is heading the opposite direction, while the three passersby are heading towards Jerusalem.]

    The route followed the top of the Judean hills
    The Roman roadworks closer to Jerusalem
    Detail of the Roman road

    This area continues to be a remote and secluded place, despite its proximity to Jerusalem. The ancient St George’s Monastery clings to the northern edge of the Wadi Qelt and is home to a small community of Greek Orthodox monks.

    St George’s Monastery, Wadi Qelt. Photograph © 2016 Gregory C. Jenks

    A friend in need …

    We usually think about this parable as an invitation for us to be kind to other people.

    That totally misses the radical point being made by Jesus.

    Sorry!

    This parable is not seeking to turn the world upside down by asking us to be nice to people when they are having a tough time.

    Rather, this is a parable that invites us to—which demands that we—rethink the circle of affection and care within which we choose to live.

    Let’s go back into the story.

    It is a classic tale where three characters have an opportunity to meet the needs of the man lying in the ditch.

    He has been attacked, robbed, and left for dead.

    As he lies in the ditch beside the road three people come along the track. Each of them is heading in the other direction, but any of them could help this person in their distress.

    So Jesus tells the story …

    Now by chance a priest was going down that road;
    and when he saw him, he passed by on the other side.
    [Luke 10:31]

    Can you imagine the reaction of Jesus’ audience?

    Well, of course! Just what we would expect!

    So likewise a Levite, when he came to the place and saw him,
    passed by on the other side.
    [Luke 10:32]

    And the crowd thinks … a Levite, a Deacon, an LLM, a seminarian, a PC member … typical!

    But wait. There is a third character. As there always is in a story like this.

    Who are the crowd expecting to be the third passerby. Who will be the hero of the story?

    Of course, it will be someone like them. Not a priest. Not a Levite. But a regular Jewish person. A farmer perhaps, or a merchant …

    Surprise …

    But a Samaritan while travelling came near him; and when he saw him, he was moved with pity. He went to him and bandaged his wounds, having poured oil and wine on them. Then he put him on his own animal, brought him to an inn, and took care of him. The next day he took out two denarii, gave them to the innkeeper, and said, ‘Take care of him; and when I come back, I will repay you whatever more you spend.’ [Luke 10:33–35]

    That is not supposed to happen.

    To express it in our terms …

    Imagine a Jewish driver whose car has crashed, and he is rescued by a Palestinian …

    Or a Ukrainian soldier who is rescued by a Russian …

    Or coal miner who is rescued by a Climate Change activist …


    Anyone but them …

    The challenge of this parable is to imagine ourselves as the victim and then see the last person on earth from whom we ever wish to receive help come around the bend in the track, look at us, smile and then … worse still … come across to assist us!

    We know that dynamic …

    Who are the people from whom we are most estranged?

    Can we be helpful to them? (This is the usual reading of this parable.)

    Can we accept help from them? (This is the real challenge of this parable.)

    In this town?

    In our families?

    Here in this church?

    Do we really want to be peacemakers? Agents of Jesus?

    Do we want to be Jesus people here in Casino?

  • Agents of an alternative reality

    Agents of an alternative reality

    Image: An ancient Roman road. Wikimedia Commons.


    This post is part of the ON THE WAY sermon series at St Mark’s Anglican Church, Casino July/October 2022


    This is the first of a series of sermons at St Mark’s Anglican Church, Casino as we step inside the story of Jesus as crafted by Luke and walk with Jesus “on the way” to Jerusalem.

    The journey will be incomplete as I am only serving as locum until Wednesday, 5 October.

    However, during the next 13 weeks we shall open our hearts and our imagination to reflect on one question: What does it mean to be Jesus people here in Casino now? Week after week we shall be engaging with that question, using the weekly Gospel reading as a prompt for spiritual wisdom.


    Good news by design

    Let’s begin by zooming out, as it were, so that can see the forest and not just a handful of trees.

    The “forest” in this case is a major literary project undertaken towards the end of the first 100 years after Easter. That project involved two volumes. Both volumes found their way into the New Testament, but in the process they were separated from each other and for a long time their original connection was overlooked.

    The first volume tells the story of Jesus. We now call it the Gospel according to Luke, and this year it is the chosen gospel for our reflections almost every Sunday. Last year we especially listened to Mark’s version and next year we shall focus on Matthew, but right now we are listening especially to the way that Luke described Jesus.

    The second volume tells the story of what happened with the project Jesus started. We call it the Acts of the Apostles, and it traces the spread of the Jesus message from Jerusalem to Rome; to the very heart of Empire.

    For convenience we refer to the complete two-part document as “Luke-Acts.”

    In Luke-Acts the “good news” (an official Roman political term for an official announcement) moves from Nazareth to Rome; from the edge of empire to the very centre of power.

    Very soon after it was published, the Gospel of Luke was put into a convenient collection of Gospels alongside Matthew, Mark and John. That is where we still find it in our Bibles today.

    Part two of the project, the Acts of the Apostles, became separated from the Gospel of Luke. Today we find it in between the Gospels and the Letters, where it forms a kind of a bridge between the story of Jesus and the letters of the Apostles: Paul, and then the “big three” of Peter, James and John.

    In this sermon series we shall focus on the Gospel part of that ancient Christian project, since this is the text we shall be working with over the next few months.

    Unlike the other gospels, the Gospel of Luke begins with a statement by the author/editor:

    Since many have undertaken to set down an orderly account of the events that have been fulfilled among us, just as they were handed on to us by those who from the beginning were eyewitnesses and servants of the word, I too decided, after investigating everything carefully from the very first, to write an orderly account for you, most excellent Theophilus, so that you may know the truth concerning the things about which you have been instructed. [Luke 1:1–4]

    Interestingly, this preface tells us the name of the person for whom the project has been prepared, but not the name of the person doing the work! It is traditional to call this anonymous author, “Luke.” We shall do that for convenience, although we do not know anything about this person even if that was their name.

    The author of this two-volume account is aware that others have prepared similar documents before him, and it seems that “Luke” was able to undertake investigations to assist him in his own project. While he does not expressly say he read and used the earlier documents, we can see that he certainly did so.

    More importantly Luke indicates that his goal was to provide Theophilus with an orderly account. I understand this to mean that Luke was choosing what information to record and how best to arrange the material for the benefit of his reader. In 1:4 Luke uses a Greek word, catechesis, to describe the instruction which Theophilus would acquire by paying attention to Luke-Acts. We know that same term from our word, Catechism.


    The Great Journey

    One of the ways that Luke arranges his instructional material for Theophilus was to use the simple fact that Jesus needed to relocate from Galilee to Jerusalem, but he develops that into a meme that forms the central section of the Gospel.

    From 9:51 through until 19:44, Luke describes Jesus as being on the way to Jerusalem.

    This relocation is given a special significance by the way that Luke notes its commencement:

    When the days drew near for him to be taken up, 
    he set his face to to go to Jerusalem.
    [Luke 9:51]

    This is no routine trip south. This is the journey Jesus had to make “when the time came.” As Luke tells the story, in choosing to start this journey at that time Jesus was embracing the call of God upon him. As Jesus takes the first steps south he is saying, “Yes” to God.

    The Gospel of Luke has 24 chapters and almost half of them are allocated to this journey that Jesus makes. In the previous chapters (3–9) Jesus has been active in Galilee, and in the following few chapters (20–24) Jesus will encounter the authorities in Jerusalem who seek to destroy him, but for now he is on the road, making his way to Jerusalem.

    The first Gospel writer—Mark—dealt with that transition with a very brief statement:

    He left that place and went to the region of Judea and beyond the Jordan. And crowds again gathered around him; and, as was his custom, he again taught them. [Mark 10:1]

    A little later Matthew developed that simple statement a little further as he prepared a revised edition of the brief document prepared by Mark:

    While Jesus was going up to Jerusalem, he took the twelve disciples aside by themselves, and said to them on the way, “See, we are going up to Jerusalem, and the Son of Man will be handed over to the chief priests and scribes, and they will condemn him to death; then they will hand him over to the Gentiles to be mocked and flogged and crucified; and on the third day he will be raised.” [Matthew 20:17–19]

    The Gospel of John famously has Jesus make several trips to Jerusalem, but Luke has developed the historical fact that Jesus made a final one-way trip to Jerusalem from Galilee into an extended reflection on what it means to be a disciple of Jesus.

    During the weeks between Trinity Sunday and Christ the King we join Jesus on that journey which Luke has developed in such detail.


    Seventy people on mission

    In the first part of today’s Gospel we have Jesus choosing 70 people from the crowd of people travelling with him, and sending them ahead in pairs to each of the places he planned to visit on his way south.

    Let’s pause and think about that.

    From Nazareth to Jerusalem is about 100 km as the crow flies.

    It needed about 4 days to walk there, unlike the 2 hours needed to do the trip by car today.

    Jesus could get to Jerusalem in less than a week, but he is making arrangements to visit 35 villages on along the way. Maybe more than that, since each pair of people will visit several towns before Jesus gets there. This is a major operation which Jesus potentially gathering support from 100+ villages along the way.

    As Luke tells the story, Jesus seems to be in no hurry to get to Jerusalem.

    As Luke tells the story, it was as much about the journey as the destination.

    As Luke tells the story, this trip will take quite a while. There will be time for reflection, questions and insights. No one gets to ask, “Are we there yet?”


    The instructions to the 35 sets of advance teams are not exactly encouraging:

    He said to them, “The harvest is plentiful, but the laborers are few; therefore ask the Lord of the harvest to send out laborers into his harvest. Go on your way. See, I am sending you out like lambs into the midst of wolves. Carry no purse, no bag, no sandals; and greet no one on the road. Whatever house you enter, first say, ‘Peace to this house!’ And if anyone is there who shares in peace, your peace will rest on that person; but if not, it will return to you. [Luke 10:2–6]

    Those instructions, by the way, are very similar to the words when Jesus sent out the Twelve at the start of chapter 9, but the Twelve had been given authority over all demons and to cure diseases. The 35 advance teams are being told to make do with what they have, and to pray that God will send more people to help.

    These 35 advance teams are not commissioned to heal the sick or cast out demons, but it seems that is what they did anyway. We note their conversation with Jesus when they returned after completing their tasks.

    What they are told to do is to offer the gift of God’s shalom to each of the homes they entered, and tell people (regardless of their response) that God’s reign has drawn close to them.

    And that was even before Jesus got there!

    As soon as these folk turned up with a message of peace the kingdom of God had arrived.

    Simply by sharing a message of peace the reign of God was becoming active in those villages.

    They were not asked to sign them up as supporters of the Jesus campaign. They were not asked to baptise people. They were not told to instruct them in the parables and sayings of Jesus. They were not asked to collect money from them. They were not asked to organise a church.

    They were simply to be messengers of God’s peace, the rule of God. Right now. Right here.


    Regular folks with an amazing mission

    And notice who these people were.

    At least 58 of them were not the Twelve and maybe none of them were!

    These were just regular people who had been hanging around Jesus for a bit, and were now on the road to Jerusalem with him. Not even regular folks. These were most likely the marginal folk who had embraced the message of Jesus after an encounter that changed their lives. As much as anything, they were on the road with him and heading to Jerusalem, because they had nowhere else to be and no other place to call home.

    These are the people Jesus sends ahead of him.

    Not the Twelve but the rest. The Seventy.

    And maybe that is the task Jesus gives us here in Casino as well.

    We are called to be people whose own lives have been touched in some way by God in Jesus, and we offer a taste of that to others. We wish them well (peace, shalom). We share the secret that God is here among us and that they can choose to welcome the kingdom of God. The choice is theirs. And ours.

  • Ecological impacts of Zionism

    Ecological impacts of Zionism

    Many years ago, I think 2006, I attended a seminar presented by the Applied Research Institute in Jerusalem (ARIJ) on the environmental damage being perpetrated – and indeed, perpetuated – by Israel as it pursues its Zionist dream.

    This weekend there is a report along similar lines in Haaretz, perhaps best represented by this extract:

    Poor planning and neglect can be found in other countries, too. But they compensate for it with spectacular wild landscapes and architectural gems. Not so in Israel. Once there was a delightfully beautiful country here, but no longer: Zionism has wrought irredeemable destruction on it. In the long term, this is the principal legacy of the Zionist project. Political regimes will come and go here in the future, as they have done in the past. But eons will be needed to undo the ecological and aesthetic harm we have inflicted on the earth. A limestone hill truncated by bulldozers is now gone forever. A lizard that has become extinct will never exist again. If it would take a few million years for the world’s flora and fauna to rehabilitate themselves from the damage wrought by humanity to the planet, undoing the damage caused by Zionism will take twice as long.

    Ofri Ilany, Haaretz, 12 May 2022

    At the heart of all three Abrahamic religions is a mandate for humans to care for the earth, the khalifa principle in Islam has parallels in Jewish thought and in Christian theology.

    To devastate the biblical lands with such ferocity and trigger such long term consequences is an ecological Nakba that compounds and extends the violence of the historical Nakba of 1948.

    Long after there is a free Palestine from the river to the sea, providing full citizenship and authentic freedom to all its people, the land will suffer the consequenecs of these few decades of self-indulgent and destructive Zionism.