Author: Gregory C. Jenks

  • Second Sunday after Christmas (5 January 2014)

    Contents

    Lectionary

    • Jeremiah 31:7-14 & Psalm 147:12-20 (or Sirach 24:1-12 & or WisSol 10:15-21)
    • Ephesians 1:3-14
    • John 1:(1-9), 10-18

    Introduction

    A Second Sunday of Christmas only occurs when Christmas occurs late enough in the week for a two Sundays to occur between then and Epiphany on January 6. The focus on this day falls on the theological significance of the Incarnation, and this is especially well brought out by the alternative reading from the Old Testament, together with its canticle in lieu of a Psalm.

    Since Sunday, 12 January 2014 is Epiphany 1A (also observed as the Festival of the Baptism of Jesus), many communities will observe Epiphany this coming Sunday, rather than the propers for Christmas 2A.

    Alternative First Reading: Sirach 24:1-12

    This reading, together with its alternative canticle from Wisdom of Solomon, draws on the ancient Jewish traditions about divine Wisdom.

    In several of the writings from the Ketubim and the deuterocanonical books, we can trace a developing interest in a mysterious figure, Lady Wisdom. Wisdom is a feminine noun in both Hebrew (hokmah) and Greek (sophia). This may have prompted the earnest but chaste scribes of Jerusalem to project their interest in women upon a more worthy and yet entirely unattainable woman, Lady Wisdom.

    Lady Wisdom stands in the street calling for wise men (sic) who will respond to her call and make the pursuit of her pleasures the center of their life. By contrast to Lady Wisdom, the forbidden woman is a dangerous option.

    In words that will later be echoed by the depiction of Jesus as “Child of Sophia,” we find Wisdom building a house and laying a feast for those who will come when invited.

    Wisdom has built her house,
    she has hewn her seven pillars.
    She has slaughtered her animals, she has mixed her wine,
    she has also set her table.
    She has sent out her servant girls, she calls
    from the highest places in the town,
    “You that are simple, turn in here!”
    To those without sense she says,
    “Come, eat of my bread
    and drink of the wine I have mixed.
    Lay aside immaturity, and live,
    and walk in the way of insight.” (Prov 9:1–6)

    For further details of this significant theological trajectory in ancient Judaism and earliest Christianity, see:

    The alternative canticle listed for this week represents one of the highpoints of the Lady Wisdom trajectory. It comes from the Wisdom of Solomon, a text believed to be more or less contemporary with Jesus. In the Wisdom of Solomon we find ourselves in a universe of ideas not very far from the prologue to John’s Gospel, the passage set for today’s Gospel.

    Second Reading: Ephesians 1:3-14

    The early Christian hymn quoted at the beginning of this deutero-Pauline letter provides a glimpse into the earliest stages of Christian devotion to Jesus as a divine figure.

    The hymn has echoes of the wisdom mythology, including the idea that God’s secret and eternal purposes are known to the Christ and revealed to his followers. In traditional Jewish wisdom theology, the one who is with God at creation and knows all his plans is none other than Lady Wisdom herself. Here those attributes seem to be reassigned to Jesus.

    According to this hymn, all God’s cosmic purposes are known to and embodied in “the Beloved.” However, there is also a collective dimesion to this Christ myth, since all who are one with the Beloved will share in his destiny and be drawn into the fulfillment of God’s purposes.

    It is interesting to observe how quickly early Christian devotion to Jesus developed such cosmic imagery, as we are still at a period when the Synoptic traditions are taking written form and they seem to present Jesus in a much more terrestrial mode. The advanced Christological speculation of Ephesians does not seem to have gained a hearing in the circles from which we received Matthew, Mark and Luke.

    Gospel: John 1:1-18

    The prologue to the Gospel according to John is designated as the Gospel for this Sunday.

    This ancient hymn represents the high water mark for NT claims of divinity for Jesus. In this poetic text Jesus is identified as the incarnate Logos, the supreme expression of God’s own being in human experience. While most attention has tended to fall on the opening verses with their echoes of Genesis 1 and their high Christology, the literary structure of the poem suggests that the intended message is more about the special status of Christ’s followers.

    In his influential article, “The Pivot of John’s Prologue” (New Testament Studies 27 [1980]: 1-31). R. A. Culpepper has suggested the following chiastic structure for the prologue:

    vv 1–2 are balanced by v 18
    vv 3 is balanced by v 17
    vv4–5 are balanced by vv 16
    vv 6–8 are balanced by vv 15
    vv 9–10 are balanced by v 14
    v 11 is balanced by v 13,
    v 12a is balanced by v 12c

    v12b is the pivot of the chiasmus: “He gave them authority to become the children of God.”

    If this is a valid reading of the prologue, then it its primary purpose is to encourage the reader to embrace his/her own calling as a child of God, rather than to promote a particular Christology. It assumes a very high view of Jesus, perhaps by drawing on the familiar Wisdom/Logos traditions. But its point in doing that was to promote an understanding of the Christian life as a call to be(come) the children of God.

    By analogy, we might suggest that the point of Christmas is not so much to celebrate the birth of Jesus as to proclaim an even more radical religious claim:

    That everyday people are children of God,
    if only we would accept the truth revealed by the child whose birth we celebrate,
    and choose to live into that mysterious new reality.

    Jesus Database

    Liturgies and Prayers

    For liturgies and sermons each week, shaped by a progressive theology, check Rex Hunt’s web site

    Other recommended sites include:

     

    Music Suggestions

    See David MacGregor’s Together to Celebrate site for recommendations from a variety of contemporary genre.

  • Sunday after Christmas (29 December 2013)

    Contents

    Lectionary

    • Isaiah 63:7-9 and Psalm 148
    • Hebrews 2:10-18
    • Matthew 2:13-23

     

    Herod threatens the Christ Child

    Many churches this Sunday will recount the sequel to the visit of the Magi from Matthew’s account of the birth of Jesus.

    Matthew’s story of Jesus’ birth can be outlined as follows:

    • 1:1–17 Jesus’ family tree
    • 1:18–25 Conception and birth
    • 2:1–12 Threat to the Christ child
    • 2:13–15 Escape
    • 2:16–18 Massacre of the Innocents
    • 2:19–23 Moving to Nazareth

    This story has been crafted by Matthew somewhere during the last quarter of the first century. Its original intention was not to chronicle the events of Jesus’ conception and childhood, but to celebrate the prophetic significance of Jesus and to place him securely within the Jewish tradition. Affirmation of the biblical and providential character of Jesus would have been especially significant to Jewish Christians such as Matthew’s community as they found themselves increasingly excluded from the synagogue communities in the aftermath of the Jewish war.

    Matthew’s infancy story leaves the reader in no doubt that Jesus was deeply Jewish. In the story of his childhood, Matthew has Jesus re-live in his own experience some of the most central themes of Jewish identity. This match is especially close in the episodes that describe the flight to Egypt and the eventual return of the Christ child to Palestine.

    In his recent study of the birth stories of Jesus and “other sons of God,” Robert Miller comments on the close literary relationship between the story of Moses in Exodus and Matthew’s story of Jesus:

    (Matt) 2:19-21 is closely modeled in Ex 4:19-20 and is also nearly identical to Matt 2:13-14. Matthew’s formulaic wording creates an almost exact symmetry between Jesus’ two journeys to Egypt and back to Israel. It looks like Matthew wrote 2:19-21 in careful imitation of Ex 4:19-20 and then used it to clone 2:13-14, making the necessary adjustment in the reference to Herod in v. 13b. [Born Divine, 111]

    Miller provides the following table that shows the close relationship between these texts:

     

    Exodus 4:19-20
    Matt 2:19-21
    Matt 2:13-14
    After these many days the king of Egypt died. After Herod’s death After they had departed,
    The Lord said a messenger of the Lord appeared in a dream a messenger of the Lord appeared in a dream
    to Moses in Midian, to Joseph in Egypt and said to him, to Joseph and said to him,
      “Get up, take the child and his mother, “Get up, take the child and his mother,
    “Go back to Egypt, and return to the land of Israel, and flee to Egypt,
    for all those who were seeking your life are dead.” for those who were seeking the child’s life are dead.” for Herod is determined to seek out the child and destroy him.”
    Moses took his wife and children and put them on donkeys and returned to Egypt. So he got up, took the child and his mother and returned to the land of Israel. So he got up, took the child and his mother, and left for Egypt.

    In addition to the Moses traditions, even as developed in the widespread Moses Haggadah, the idea that a newborn hero might be in some danger from a hostile tyrant was a familiar element in Greek and oriental mythology.

    Danger for baby Sargon

    From ancient Sumer (c. 2,300 BCE) we have the story of Sargon II, future ruler of the Akkdian empire, cast adrift after birth by his (unmarried?) young mother:

    1. Sargon, the mighty king, king of Akkadê am I,
    2. My mother was lowly; my father I did not know;
    3. The brother of my father dwelt in the mountain.
    4. My city is Azupiranu, which is situated on the bank of the Purattu [Euphrates],
    5. My lowly mother conceived me, in secret she brought me forth.
    6. She placed me in a basket of reeds, she closed my entrance with bitumen,
    7. She cast me upon the rivers which did not overflow me.
    8. The river carried me, it brought me to Akki, the irrigator.
    9. Akki, the irrigator, in the goodness of his heart lifted me out,
    10. Akki, the irrigator, as his own son brought me up;
    11. Akki, the irrigator, as his gardener appointed me.
    SOURCE

     

    Romulus and Remus

    The Roman historian, Tacitus, tells the story of Romulus and Remus being at risk due to the evil intentions of Tarchetius, king of Alba:

    For to Tarchetius, they say, king of Alba, who was a most wicked and cruel man, there appeared in his own house a strange vision, a male figure that rose out of a hearth, and stayed there for many days. There was an oracle of Tethys in Tuscany which Tarchetius consulted, and received an answer that a virgin should give herself to the apparition, and that a son should be born of her, highly renowned, eminent for valour, good fortune, and strength of body. Tarchetius told the prophecy to one of his own daughters, and commanded her to do this thing; which she avoiding as an indignity, sent her handmaid. Tarchetius, hearing this, in great anger imprisoned them both, purposing to put them to death, but being deterred from murder by the goddess Vesta in a dream, enjoined them for their punishment the working a web of cloth, in their chains as they were, which when they finished, they should be suffered to marry; but whatever they worked by day, Tarchetius commanded others to unravel in the night. In the meantime, the waiting-woman was delivered of two boys, whom Tarchetius gave into the hands of one Teratius, with command to destroy them; he, however, carried and laid them by the river side, where a wolf came and continued to suckle them, while birds of various sorts brought little morsels of food, which they put into their mouths; till a cowherd, spying them, was first strangely surprised, but, venturing to draw nearer, took the children up in his arms. Thus they were saved, and when they grew up, set upon Tarchetius and overcame him. This one Promathion says, who compiled a history of Italy.

     

    The dragon and the Christ Child

    While the same motif is known from fairy tales and popular traditions around the world, we find another significant example within the NT itself. In Rev 12:1-12 we have another story of the messianic child being at risk as the Dragon attacks immediately after the infant’s birth:

    A great portent appeared in heaven: a woman clothed with the sun, with the moon under her feet, and on her head a crown of twelve stars. She was pregnant and was crying out in birth pangs, in the agony of giving birth. Then another portent appeared in heaven: a great red dragon, with seven heads and ten horns, and seven diadems on his heads. His tail swept down a third of the stars of heaven and threw them to the earth. Then the dragon stood before the woman who was about to bear a child, so that he might devour her child as soon as it was born. And she gave birth to a son, a male child, who is to rule all the nations with a rod of iron. But her child was snatched away and taken to God and to his throne; and the woman fled into the wilderness, where she has a place prepared by God, so that there she can be nourished for one thousand two hundred sixty days.
    And war broke out in heaven; Michael and his angels fought against the dragon. The dragon and his angels fought back, but they were defeated, and there was no longer any place for them in heaven. The great dragon was thrown down, that ancient serpent, who is called the Devil and Satan, the deceiver of the whole world–he was thrown down to the earth, and his angels were thrown down with him.
    Then I heard a loud voice in heaven, proclaiming,

    “Now have come the salvation and the power
    and the kingdom of our God
    and the authority of his Messiah,
    for the accuser of our comrades has been thrown down,
    who accuses them day and night before our God.
    But they have conquered him by the blood of the Lamb
    and by the word of their testimony,
    for they did not cling to life even in the face of death.
    Rejoice then, you heavens
    and those who dwell in them!
    But woe to the earth and the sea,
    for the devil has come down to you
    with great wrath,
    because he knows that his time is short!”

    This appears to be a Jewish messianic text rather than a Christian composition. Although its present form betrays some Christian influences, it is hard to imagine a Christian writer composing a text in which the savior role is attributed to Michael the Archangel. In any case, what we have is clearly a mythic tale of the Christ child being in peril as the powers of Satan attack soon after his birth.

    Matthew’s story is no less mythic even though his characters are historical figures and the location is the eastern Mediterranean. Herod is every inch the great red dragon, and the holy family flee to Egypt so that the great mythic themes of exodus are re-enacted in the experience of this new “Joshua” (as Jesus would have been called in Hebrew).

     

    The spider and the cave

    Such stories celebrate the providential involvement of God in human affairs, an insight that lies very close to the heart of the Incarnation. A much later story that elaborates on the theme of the flight to Egypt is the legend of the spider and the cave:

    The Holy Family stumbled wearily into a dark, damp cave on their way to Egypt. It was a cold, freezing night – so cold that the ground was carpeted with a white hoar-frost. Tired as they were, Mary and Joseph busied themselves trying to make the cave as warm as they could for their new-born child. But it was all to no avail. It was impossible to light a fire as the wind blew mercilessly into the cave. Soon the baby began to cry and awoke a sleeping spider. The spider was moved when he saw Jesus and decided that somehow he must do something to help Mary and Joseph. So, patiently, he began to spin a web across the entrance of the cave to make a kind of curtain which would shield them from the searing wind. It was hard work and the spider was near to exhaustion when it was finished. He had only just completed his work however, when a detachment of Herod’s soldiers approached the cave. Blood was on their swords and hate in their hearts. Their mission was to kill the infant Jesus. The spider trembled with fear as he heard them stop outside the cave and prepare to burst in and search it. He looked at the now sleeping Jesus and prayed with all his might for a miracle. He was not disappointed. The soldiers were just about to enter the cave when the captain noticed the slender web, covered with white hoar-frost, stretched across the entrance. He laughed hideously and cursed his men for their ignorance. “Can’t you see the spider’s web, you idiots?” he cried. “It’s completely unbroken. There can’t possibly be anyone in the cave, otherwise they would have certainly torn the web.” And so the soldiers went on their way and the infant Jesus slept peacefully that night because the little spider had given up his night’s sleep to spin his web.

    Jesus Database

     

    Liturgies and Prayers

    For liturgies and sermons each week, shaped by a progressive theology, check Rex Hunt’s web site

    Other recommended sites include:

     

    Music Suggestions

    See David MacGregor’s Together to Celebrate site for recommendations from a variety of contemporary genre.

  • Reflections from Palestine

    Reflections from Palestine: A Journey of Hope.
    A memoir by Samia Nasir Khoury.
    Nicosia, Cyprus: Rimal Publications, 2014. ISBN 978-9963-715-11-4

    Samia Nasir Khoury celebrated her eightieth birthday on Sunday, 24 November 2013. This was also the final day of the Ninth International Sabeel Conference. Following a service at the Lutheran Church of the Ascension at Augusta Victoria on the Mount of Olives, the 200 delegates renewed our commitment to justice and peace at Qasr el Yahud, the Baptism site on the Jordan River before going to the Intercontinental Hotel in Jericho. There we were joined by an additional 200 Sabeel members for an afternoon of celebrations to mark the twenty-fifth anniversary of Palestinian Liberation Theology.

    As Samia noted in an email to friends shortly after the conference ended, never had she experienced so many people singing happy birthday to her. It was especially fitting that this book was available for purchase that afternoon as so much of the story goes to the heart of Sabeel’s work in developing and practising Palestinian Liberation Theology.

    Together with her long time friends—Cedar Duaybis and Jean Zaru—Samia Khoury has been one of the founders of Sabeel. These strong women of Palestine have played a leading role in the organization and their lives radiate with the virtue of summud, steadfast persistence. In the face of occupation and never-ending harassment, these women and their millions of anonymous Palestinian compatriots stand firm and refuse to oblige the Zionist dream by fleeing the land of their ancestors.

    This book is both easy to read and hard to read, all at the same time. It is a gentle book as one articulate and passionate woman tells the story of her family through decades of occupation and hardship. It is a confronting book as the unremitting evil of the occupation is parsed out in the details of everyday life under belligerent military rule.

    Yet this is a woman who has raised a family and cared for her grandchildren. I have met one of those grandchildren, and she is every bit as articulate and determined as Samia herself.

    In addition to her life as a wife, mother and grandmother, Samia has served as a founding Trustee of Birzeit University, a founder of Sabeel, and the President of the YWCA in East Jerusalem. Her personal circle of contacts around the world is a testament to her character and stamina, and this book had its genesis in a series of essays written for the magazine, Witness. I am glad that she wrote those essays and even more pleased that she agreed to edit them into this collection of reflections. Her personal integrity shines through these pages. I hope this book is widely read and, more importantly, that it inspires us all to do more to end the occupation that diminishes the humanity of the Israeli occupiers as much as it harms the Palestinians.

  • Fourth Sunday of Advent (22 December 2013)

    Contents

    Lectionary

    • Isaiah 7:10-16 and Psalm 80:1-7, 17-19
    • Romans 1:1-7
    • Matthew 1:18-25

     

    The Birth of the Messiah (Matthew’s story of Jesus’ birth)

    Being Year A, the focus on this Sunday before Christmas falls on the account of Jesus’ birth in the Gospel of Matthew. Matthew was most likely written between the mid-80s and early 90s of the first century. His account of Jesus’ birth reflects ancient interests in the special circumstances surrounding the birth of a hero. This account is distinctively different from that found in Luke, with the following major elements: family tree, unexpected conception, failed attempt to kill him, exile in Egypt, move to Nazareth.

    Matthew’s story of Jesus’ birth can be outlined as follows:

    • 1:1–17 Jesus’ family tree
    • 1:18–25 Conception and birth
    • 2:1–12 Threat to the Christ child
    • 2:13–15 Escape
    • 2:16–18 Massacre of the Innocents
    • 2:19–23 Moving to Nazareth

    Matthew seems to have been influenced by Jewish traditions about the birth and childhood of Moses when writing his story about the birth of Jesus. These traditions are known as the Moses Haggadah (“Haggadah” is a Hebrew word for story.)

    The Biblical story of Moses’ birth celebrated the special significance of Moses but left many questions unanswered.

    1:8 Now a new king arose over Egypt, who did not know Joseph.9 He said to his people, “Look, the Israelite people are more numerous and more powerful than we.10 Come, let us deal shrewdly with them, or they will increase and, in the event of war, join our enemies and fight against us and escape from the land.”11 Therefore they set taskmasters over them to oppress them with forced labor. They built supply cities, Pithom and Rameses, for Pharaoh.12 But the more they were oppressed, the more they multiplied and spread, so that the Egyptians came to dread the Israelites.13 The Egyptians became ruthless in imposing tasks on the Israelites,14 and made their lives bitter with hard service in mortar and brick and in every kind of field labor. They were ruthless in all the tasks that they imposed on them.

    15 The king of Egypt said to the Hebrew midwives, one of whom was named Shiphrah and the other Puah,16 “When you act as midwives to the Hebrew women, and see them on the birthstool, if it is a boy, kill him; but if it is a girl, she shall live.”17 But the midwives feared God; they did not do as the king of Egypt commanded them, but they let the boys live.18 So the king of Egypt summoned the midwives and said to them, “Why have you done this, and allowed the boys to live?”19 The midwives said to Pharaoh, “Because the Hebrew women are not like the Egyptian women; for they are vigorous and give birth before the midwife comes to them.”20 So God dealt well with the midwives; and the people multiplied and became very strong.21 And because the midwives feared God, he gave them families.22 Then Pharaoh commanded all his people, “Every boy that is born to the Hebrews you shall throw into the Nile, but you shall let every girl live.”<BR<
    2:1 Now a man from the house of Levi went and married a Levite woman.2 The woman conceived and bore a son; and when she saw that he was a fine baby, she hid him three months.3 When she could hide him no longer she got a papyrus basket for him, and plastered it with bitumen and pitch; she put the child in it and placed it among the reeds on the bank of the river.4 His sister stood at a distance, to see what would happen to him.

    5 The daughter of Pharaoh came down to bathe at the river, while her attendants walked beside the river. She saw the basket among the reeds and sent her maid to bring it.6 When she opened it, she saw the child. He was crying, and she took pity on him. “This must be one of the Hebrews’ children,” she said.7 Then his sister said to Pharaoh’s daughter, “Shall I go and get you a nurse from the Hebrew women to nurse the child for you?”8 Pharaoh’s daughter said to her, “Yes.” So the girl went and called the child’s mother.9 Pharaoh’s daughter said to her, “Take this child and nurse it for me, and I will give you your wages.” So the woman took the child and nursed it.10 When the child grew up, she brought him to Pharaoh’s daughter, and she took him as her son. She named him Moses, “because,” she said, “I drew him out of the water.” [Exodus 1:8-2:10]

     

    The birth of Moses in ancient Jewish tradition

    From Jewish writings of the Second temple period, we know that this biblical passage inspired further elaboration on the Moses story. While no single surviving text contains a complete Moses haggadah, we can trace the general outlines of this complex that seems to have shaped the way Matthew depicts the infancy of his own hero, Jesus the Messiah.

    Egyptian Horus legend

    Seth went searching for Horus, still a child, in his hiding place in Chemmis (the Nile Delta marshland), after his mother (Isis) had hidden him in a papyrus thicket. [The text goes on to say that the child was in a reed boat.]
    [Pap. Jumilhac, cited by Plaut, Torah, 392]

    An Akkadian legend of Sargon

    Sargon, the mighty king, king of Agade, am I.
    My mother was a high priestess, my father I knew not.
    The brother of my father loved the hills.
    My city is Azupiranu, which is situated on the banks of the Euphrates.
    My priestly mother conceived me, in secret she bore me.
    She set me in a basket of rushes, with bitumen she sealed my lid.
    She cast me into the river which rose not over me.
    The river bore me up and carried me to Akki, the drawer of water.
    Akki, the drawer of water, lifted me out as he dipped his ewer.
    Akki, the drawer of water, took me as his son and reared me.
    [Pritchard, ANET, 119. cited by Plaut, Torah, 392]

    Greek legend of Telephus

    Telephus was born of a union between the god Heracles and Auge, daughter of King Aleus of Tegea. The enraged father put mother and son into a wooden chest and cast them into the sea. The chest floated to the land of King Teuthras who married Auge and raised Telephus as a prince.
    [Strabo. cited by Plaut, Torah, 392]

    Pseudo-Philo, Biblical Antiquities, 9

    /9:1/ And after Joseph’s passing away, the sons of Israel multiplied and increased greatly. And another king who did not know Joseph arose in Egypt, and he said to his people, “Behold that people has multiplied more than we have. Come, let us make a plan against them so they will not multiply more.” And the king of Egypt ordered all his people, saying, “Every son that is born to the Hebrews, throw into the river; but let their females live.” And the Egyptians answered their king, saying, “Let us kill their males, and we will keep their females so that we may give them to our slaves as wives. And whoever is born from them will be a slave and serve us.” And this is what seemed wicked before the LORD.

    /2/ Then the elders of the people gathered the people together in mourning, and they mourned and groaned saying, “The wombs of our wives have suffered miscarriage; our fruit is delivered to our enemies. And now we are lost, and let us set up rules for ourselves that a man should not approach his wife lest the fruit of their wombs be defiled and our offspring serve idols. For it is better to die without sons until we know what God may do.”

    /3/ And Amram answered and said, “It will sooner happen that this age will be ended forever or the world will sink into the immeasurable deep or the heart of the abyss will touch the stars than that the race of the sons of Israel will be ended. And there will be fulfilled the covenant that God established with Abraham when he said, ‘Indeed your sons will dwell in a land not their own and will be brought into bondage and afflicted 400 years.’ And behold from the time when the word of God that he spoke to Abraham was spoken, there are 350 years; from the time when we became slaves in Egypt, there are 130 years. /4/ Now therefore I will not abide by what you decree, but I will go in and take my wife and produce sons so that we may be made many on the earth. For God will not abide in his anger, not will he forget his people forever, nor will he cast forth the race of Israel in vain upon the earth; nor did he establish a covenant with our fathers in vain; and even when we did not yet exist, God spoke about these matters. /5/ Now therefore I will go and take my wife and I will not consent to the command of the king; and if it is right in your eyes, let us all act in this way. For when our wives conceive, they will not be recognized as pregnant until three months have passed, as also our mother Tamar did. For her intent was not fornication, but being unwilling to separate from the sons of Israel she reflected and said, ‘It is better for me to die for having intercourse with my father-in-law than to have intercourse with gentiles.’ And she hid the fruit of her womb until the third month. For then she was recognized. And on her way to be put to death, she made a declaration saying, ‘He who own this staff and this signet ring and the sheepskin, from him I have conceived.’ And her intent saved her from all danger. /6/ Now therefore let us also do the same. And when the time of giving birth has been completed, we will not cast forth the fruit of our womb (if we are able). And who knows if God will not be provoked on account of this so as to free us from our humiliation?”

    /7/ And the strategy that Amram thought out was pleasing before God. And God said, “Because Amram’s plan is pleasing to me, and he has not put aside the covenant established between me and his fathers, so behold now he who will be born from him will serve me forever, and I will do marvelous things in the house of Jacob through him and I will work through him signs and wonders for my people that I have not done for anyone else; and I will act gloriously among them and proclaim to them my ways. /8/ And I, God, will kindle for him my lamp that will abide in him, and I will show him my covenant that no one has seen. And I will reveal to him my Law and statutes and judgments, and I will burn an eternal light for him, because I thought of him in the days of old, saying, ‘My spirit will not be a mediator among these men forever, because they are flesh and their days will be 20 years.’”

    /9/ And Amram of the tribe of Levi went out and took a wife from his own tribe. When he had taken her, others followed him and took their own wives. And this man had one son and one daughter; their names were Aaron and Miriam. /10/ And the spirit of God came upon Miriam one night, and she saw a dream and told it to her parents in the morning, saying, “I have seen this night, and behold a man in a linen garment stood and said to me, ‘Go and say to your parents, “Behold he who will be born from you will be cast forth into the water; likewise through him the water will be dried up. And I will work signs through him and save my people, and he will exercise leadership always.”‘” And when Miriam told her dream, her parents did not believe her.

    /11/ The strategy of the king of Egypt, however, prevailed against the sons of Israel, and they were humiliated and worn down in making bricks. /12/ Now Jochebed conceived from Amram and hid him in her womb for three months. For she could not conceal him any longer, because the king of Egypt appointed local chiefs who, when the Hebrew women gave birth, would immediately throw their male children into the river. And she took her child and made for him an ark from the bark of a pine tree and placed the ark at the bank of the river. /13/ Now that child was born in the covenant of God and the covenant of the flesh. /14/ And when they had cast him forth, all the elders gathered and quarreled with Amram, saying, “Are not these our words that we spoke, ‘It is better for us to die without sons than that the fruit of our womb be cast into the waters’?” And Amram did not listen to those who were saying these words. /15/ Now Pharaoh’s daughter came down to bathe in the river, as she had seen in dreams, and her maids saw the ark. And she sent one, and she fetched it and opened it. And when she saw the boy, and while she was looking upon the covenant (that is, the covenant of the flesh), she said, “It is one of the Hebrew children.” /16/ And she took him and nursed him. And he became her own son, and she called him by the name Moses. But his mother called him Melchiel. And the child was nursed and became glorious above all other men, and through him God freed the sons of Israel as he had said.
    [D.J. Harrington, Old Testament Pseudepigrapha. 2, 315f]

    Josephus

    1. NOW it happened that the Egyptians grew delicate and lazy, as to pains-taking, and gave themselves up to other pleasures, and in particular to the love of gain. They also became very ill-affected towards the Hebrews, as touched with envy at their prosperity; for when they saw how the nation of the Israelites flourished, and were become eminent already in plenty of wealth, which they had acquired by their virtue and natural love of labor, they thought their increase was to their own detriment. And having, in length of time, forgotten the benefits they had received from Joseph, particularly the crown being now come into another family, they became very abusive to the Israelites, and contrived many ways of afflicting them; for they enjoined them to cut a great number of channels for the river, and to build walls for their cities and ramparts, that they might restrain the river, and hinder its waters from stagnating, upon its running over its own banks: they set them also to build pyramids, (17) and by all this wore them out; and forced them to learn all sorts of mechanical arts, and to accustom themselves to hard labor. And four hundred years did they spend under these afflictions; for they strove one against the other which should get the mastery, the Egyptians desiring to destroy the Israelites by these labors, and the Israelites desiring to hold out to the end under them.

    2. While the affairs of the Hebrews were in this condition, there was this occasion offered itself to the Egyptians, which made them more solicitous for the extinction of our nation. One of those sacred scribes, (18) who are very sagacious in foretelling future events truly, told the king, that about this time there would a child be born to the Israelites, who, if he were reared, would bring the Egyptian dominion low, and would raise the Israelites; that he would excel all men in virtue, and obtain a glory that would be remembered through all ages. Which thing was so feared by the king, that, according to this man’s opinion, he commanded that they should cast every male child, which was born to the Israelites, into the river, and destroy it; that besides this, the Egyptian midwives (19) should watch the labors of the Hebrew women, and observe what is born, for those were the women who were enjoined to do the office of midwives to them; and by reason of their relation to the king, would not transgress his commands. He enjoined also, that if any parents should disobey him, and venture to save their male children alive, (20) they and their families should be destroyed. This was a severe affliction indeed to those that suffered it, not only as they were deprived of their sons, and while they were the parents themselves, they were obliged to be subservient to the destruction of their own children, but as it was to be supposed to tend to the extirpation of their nation, while upon the destruction of their children, and their own gradual dissolution, the calamity would become very hard and inconsolable to them. And this was the ill state they were in. But no one can be too hard for the purpose of God, though he contrive ten thousand subtle devices for that end; for this child, whom the sacred scribe foretold, was brought up and concealed from the observers appointed by the king; and he that foretold him did not mistake in the consequences of his preservation, which were brought to pass after the manner following:—

    3. A man whose name was Amram, one of the nobler sort of the Hebrews, was afraid for his whole nation, lest it should fail, by the want of young men to be brought up hereafter, and was very uneasy at it, his wife being then with child, and he knew not what to do. Hereupon he betook himself to prayer to God; and entreated him to have compassion on those men who had nowise transgressed the laws of his worship, and to afford them deliverance from the miseries they at that time endured, and to render abortive their enemies’ hopes of the destruction of their nation. Accordingly God had mercy on him, and was moved by his supplication. He stood by him in his sleep, and exhorted him not to despair of his future favors. He said further, that he did not forget their piety towards him, and would always reward them for it, as he had formerly granted his favor to their forefathers, and made them increase from a few to so great a multitude. He put him in mind, that when Abraham was come alone out of Mesopotamia into Canaan, he had been made happy, not only in other respects, but that when his wife was at first barren, she was afterwards by him enabled to conceive seed, and bare him sons. That he left to Ismael and to his posterity the country of Arabia; as also to his sons by Ketura, Troglodytis; and to Isaac, Canaan. That by my assistance, said he, he did great exploits in war, which, unless you be yourselves impious, you must still remember. As for Jacob, he became well known to strangers also, by the greatness of that prosperity in which he lived, and left to his sons, who came into Egypt with no more than seventy souls, while you are now become above six hundred thousand. Know therefore that I shall provide for you all in common what is for your good, and particularly for thyself what shall make thee famous; for that child, out of dread of whose nativity the Egyptians have doomed the Israelite children to destruction, shall be this child of thine, and shall be concealed from those who watch to destroy him: and when he is brought up in a surprising way, he shall deliver the Hebrew nation from the distress they are under from the Egyptians. His memory shall be famous while the world lasts; and this not only among the Hebrews, but foreigners also: — all which shall be the effect of my favor to thee, and to thy posterity. He shall also have such a brother, that he shall himself obtain my priesthood, and his posterity shall have it after him to the end of the world.

    4. When the vision had informed him of these things, Amram awaked and told it to Jochebed who was his wife. And now the fear increased upon them on account of the prediction in Amram’s dream; for they were under concern, not only for the child, but on account of the great happiness that was to come to him also. However, the mother’s labor was such as afforded a confirmation to what was foretold by God; for it was not known to those that watched her, by the easiness of her pains, and because the throes of her delivery did not fall upon her with violence. And now they nourished the child at home privately for three months; but after that time Amram, fearing he should be discovered, and, by falling under the king’s displeasure, both he and his child should perish, and so he should make the promise of God of none effect, he determined rather to trust the safety and care of the child to God, than to depend on his own concealment of him, which he looked upon as a thing uncertain, and whereby both the child, so privately to be nourished, and himself should be in imminent danger; but he believed that God would some way for certain procure the safety of the child, in order to secure the truth of his own predictions. When they had thus determined, they made an ark of bulrushes, after the manner of a cradle, and of a bigness sufficient for an infant to be laid in, without being too straitened: they then daubed it over with slime, which would naturally keep out the water from entering between the bulrushes, and put the infant into it, and setting it afloat upon the river, they left its preservation to God; so the river received the child, and carried him along. But Miriam, the child’s sister, passed along upon the bank over against him, as her mother had bid her, to see whither the ark would be carried, where God demonstrated that human wisdom was nothing, but that the Supreme Being is able to do whatsoever he pleases: that those who, in order to their own security, condemn others to destruction, and use great endeavors about it, fail of their purpose; but that others are in a surprising manner preserved, and obtain a prosperous condition almost from the very midst of their calamities; those, I mean, whose dangers arise by the appointment of God. And, indeed, such a providence was exercised in the case of this child, as showed the power of God.

    5. Thermuthis was the king’s daughter. She was now diverting herself by the banks of the river; and seeing a cradle borne along by the current, she sent some that could swim, and bid them bring the cradle to her. When those that were sent on this errand came to her with the cradle, and she saw the little child, she was greatly in love with it, on account of its largeness and beauty; for God had taken such great care in the formation of Moses, that he caused him to be thought worthy of bringing up, and providing for, by all those that had taken the most fatal resolutions, on account of the dread of his nativity, for the destruction of the rest of the Hebrew nation. Thermuthis bid them bring her a woman that might afford her breast to the child; yet would not the child admit of her breast, but turned away from it, and did the like to many other women. Now Miriam was by when this happened, not to appear to be there on purpose, but only as staying to see the child; and she said, “It is in vain that thou, O queen, callest for these women for the nourishing of the child, who are no way of kin to it; but still, if thou wilt order one of the Hebrew women to be brought, perhaps it may admit the breast of one of its own nation.” Now since she seemed to speak well, Thermuthis bid her procure such a one, and to bring one of those Hebrew women that gave suck. So when she had such authority given her, she came back and brought the mother, who was known to nobody there. And now the child gladly admitted the breast, and seemed to stick close to it; and so it was, that, at the queen’s desire, the nursing of the child was entirely intrusted to the mother.

    6. Hereupon it was that Thermuthis imposed this name Mouses upon him, from what had happened when he was put into the river; for the Egyptians call water by the name of Mo, and such as are saved out of it, by the name of Uses: so by putting these two words together, they imposed this name upon him. And he was, by the confession of all, according to God’s prediction, as well for his greatness of mind as for his contempt of difficulties, the best of all the Hebrews, for Abraham was his ancestor of the seventh generation. For Moses was the son of Amram, who was the son of Caath, whose father Levi was the son of Jacob, who was the son of Isaac, who was the son of Abraham. Now Moses’s understanding became superior to his age, nay, far beyond that standard; and when he was taught, he discovered greater quickness of apprehension than was usual at his age, and his actions at that time promised greater, when he should come to the age of a man. God did also give him that tallness, when he was but three years old, as was wonderful. And as for his beauty, there was nobody so unpolite as, when they saw Moses, they were not greatly surprised at the beauty of his countenance; nay, it happened frequently, that those that met him as he was carried along the road, were obliged to turn again upon seeing the child; that they left what they were about, and stood still a great while to look on him; for the beauty of the child was so remarkable and natural to him on many accounts, that it detained the spectators, and made them stay longer to look upon him.

    7. Thermuthis therefore perceiving him to be so remarkable a child, adopted him for her son, having no child of her own. And when one time had carried Moses to her father, she showed him to him, and said she thought to make him her successor, if it should please God she should have no legitimate child of her own; and to him, “I have brought up a child who is of a divine form, (21) and of a generous mind; and as I have received him from the bounty of the river, in , I thought proper to adopt him my son, and the heir of thy kingdom.” And she had said this, she put the infant into her father’s hands: so he took him, and hugged him to his breast; and on his daughter’s account, in a pleasant way, put his diadem upon his head; but Moses threw it down to the ground, and, in a puerile mood, he wreathed it round, and trod upon his feet, which seemed to bring along with evil presage concerning the kingdom of Egypt. But when the sacred scribe saw this, (he was the person who foretold that his nativity would the dominion of that kingdom low,) he made a violent attempt to kill him; and crying out in a frightful manner, he said, “This, O king! this child is he of whom God foretold, that if we kill him we shall be in no danger; he himself affords an attestation to the prediction of the same thing, by his trampling upon thy government, and treading upon thy diadem. Take him, therefore, out of the way, and deliver the Egyptians from the fear they are in about him; and deprive the Hebrews of the hope they have of being encouraged by him.” But Thermuthis prevented him, and snatched the child away. And the king was not hasty to slay him, God himself, whose providence protected Moses, inclining the king to spare him. He was, therefore, educated with great care. So the Hebrews depended on him, and were of good hopes great things would be done by him; but the Egyptians were suspicious of what would follow such his education. Yet because, if Moses had been slain, there was no one, either akin or adopted, that had any oracle on his side for pretending to the crown of Egypt, and likely to be of greater advantage to them, they abstained from killing him.
    [Antiquities of the Jews II.9]

    Book of Memory

    In the 130th year after Israel went down to Egypt, Pharaoh dreamed that he was sitting on the throne of his kingdom. He looked up and saw an old man standing before him holding a balance like those used by merchants. The old man took hold of the scales and held them up before Pharaoh Then he took all the elders of Egypt, her princes and her nobles and put them on one scale of the balance. After that he took a tender lamb and put it on the second scale. The lamb outweighed them all. Then Pharaoh wondered at this amazing sight, how the lamb outweighed them all. Pharaoh woke up and realized it was only a dream. Next morning, Pharaoh got up, summoned all his courtiers, and narrated his dream. They were all extremely frightened. Then one of the royal princes answered, “This can only mean that a great disaster will come on Egypt at the end of days.” “And what is that?” the king asked the eunuch. So the eunuch replied to the king, “A child will be born in Israel who will destroy the whole land of Egypt. If it pleases the king, let a royal statute be written here and distributed throughout the land of Egypt to kill every newborn male of the Hebrews so that the disaster will be averted from the land of Egypt.” The king did so and sent for the midwives of the Hebrews …

    When the Israelites heard Pharaoh’s decree that their male children be thrown into the river, some of the men divorced their wives but the rest stayed married to them …

    There was a man of the tribe of Levi in the land of Egypt whose name was Amram, son of Qahat, son of Levi, son of Jacob. This man married Jochebed, a daughter of Levi and his own aunt, and the woman conceived and gave birth to a daughter and called her Miriam …

    One day the Spirit of God descended on Miriam and she prophesied in the center of the house saying, “Behold, a son will be born to my father and mother at this time who will save Israel from the power of Egypt.” When Amram heard the words of the child he remarried his wife who he had divorced after the decree of Pharaoh ordering the destruction of every male of the house of Jacob. He slept with her and she conceived by him. Six months later she gave birth to a son and the house was filled with brightness like that of the sun and moon at their rising.
    [Miller, Born Divine, 131f (after Crossan, “From Moses to Jesus”)]

     

    Good News for Outsiders in Matthew’s infancy narrative

    While Matthew’s infancy narrative is deeply influenced by the Jewish traditions about Moses, he has given his story a definite twist in favour of inclusion of those who would otherwise have been excluded from the community.

    The Magi

    The most obvious expression of this can be seen in the visit of the Magi. These pagan astrologers do not belong in such a tale, but their presence highlights the differing responses to Christ by the Jewish authorities (represented here by Herod) and the gentiles. Biblical themes of gentiles coming from the ends of the earth in the messianic times are echoed here as well. The arrival of these “seekers” from the end of the earth forms something of an inclusion with the final instruction from the Risen Lord in Matt 28:16-20 (“Go, and make disciples of all nations …”).

    Tainted Women

    Another clue to Matthew’s grasp of the radical inclusion of all people in the blessings brought by Jesus comes in the genealogy in Matt 1:1-17. Four women are included in the list of Jesus’ ancestors, and five in we count Mary:

    • Tamar
    • Rahab
    • Ruth
    • the wife of Uriah (Bathsheba)
    • Mary

    If we look for something that these women have in common, including Mary the mother of Jesus, then it seems that Matthew is offering a subtle defence to allegations that Jesus’ conception involved some extramarital scandal.

    However, if Mary is excluded from consideration, the most significant characteristic that the remaining four women share (and which does not apply to Mary) is their non-Jewish ethnicity. Is it possible that Matthew is underlining his theme of inclusion for the Gentiles by mentioning these four foreigners who were either ancestors (or the wife) of King David, and ancestors of Jesus himself?

     

    Jesus Database

    Liturgies and Prayers

    For liturgies and sermons each week, shaped by a progressive theology, check Rex Hunt’s web site

    Other recommended sites include:

     

    Music Suggestions

    • Hail to the Lord’s anointed – TiS 275
    • The angel Gabriel from heaven came – TiS 302
    • Lord Jesus Christ, you have come to us – TiS 526
    • When God almighty came to be one of us – TiS 281

    See David MacGregor’s Together to Celebrate site for recommendations from a variety of contemporary genre.

  • Third Sunday of Advent (15 December 2013)

    Contents

    Lectionary

    • Isaiah 35:1-10 and Psalm 146:5-10 (or Luke 1:47-55)
    • James 5:7-10
    • Matthew 11:2-11

     

    John the Baptist in the Sayings Gospel Q

    This section in Matthews seems to combine two of the six texts from Q that deal with John the Baptist:

    • Luke 3:7-9 = Matt 3:7-10 A summary of John’s message
    • Luke 3:16-17 = Matt 3:11-12 John speaks of the Coming One
    • Luke 7:18-20 = Matt 11:2-6 Jesus identified as the Coming One
    • Luke 7:24-28 = Matt 11:7-11 Jesus praises John
    • Luke 7:31-35 = Matt 11:16-19 This generation condemned
    • Luke 16:16 = Matt 11:12-13 John and salvation history

    In Q John appears primarily as a prophetic preacher (Elijah returned at the end of time as foretold by the prophets) with almost no interest in John’s baptism ativities. There is no description of John baptizing Jesus, nothing said that locates him in the southern Jordan area and no direct description of his life as a desert hermit. At the same time, the Q tradition knows that John led an ascetic life (“eating no bread and drinking no wine”) and also that his ministry took place in the wilderness (“what did you go out to the wilderness to see”).

     

    The Messianic Signs

    The verbal agreement between Luke and Matthew is very close, although Luke elaborates the narrative framework a little more than Matthew does:

    Luke: The disciples of John reported all these things to him.
    Matt: When John heard in prison what the Messiah was doing,

    Luke: So John summoned two of his disciples and sent them to the Lord to ask,
    Matt: he sent word by his disciples and said to him,

    Luke: “Are you the one who is to come, or are we to wait for another?”
    Matt: “Are you the one who is to come, or are we to wait for another?”

    Luke: When the men had come to him, they said, “John the Baptist has sent us to you to ask,
    Matt: —

    Luke: ‘Are you the one who is to come, or are we to wait for another?’”
    Matt: —

    Luke: Jesus had just then cured many people of diseases, plagues, and evil spirits, and had given sight to many who were blind.
    Matt: —

    Luke: And he answered them,
    Matt: Jesus answered them,

    Luke: “Go and tell John what you have seen and heard:
    Matt: “Go and tell John what you hear and see:

    Luke: the blind receive their sight,
    Matt: the blind receive their sight,

    Luke: the lame walk,
    Matt: the lame walk,

    Luke: the lepers are cleansed,
    Matt: the lepers are cleansed,

    Luke: the deaf hear,
    Matt: the deaf hear,

    Luke: the dead are raised,
    Matt: the dead are raised,

    Luke: the poor have good news brought to them.
    Matt: and the poor have good news brought to them.

    Luke: And blessed is anyone who takes no offense at me.”
    Matt: And blessed is anyone who takes no offense at me.”

    Of particular interest is a fragmentary text from Qumran (4Q521 Messianic Apocalypse) which provides a significant parallel to this description of the messianic blessings that attest to Jesus as the Coming One. For ease of reading it will be cited here as reconstructed by Florentino Martinez and Eibert Tigchelaar in The Dead Sea Scrolls Study Edition (Brill, 1998):

    … for the heavens and the earth will listen to the anointed one, and all that is in them will not turn away from the precepts of the holy ones. Strengthen yourselves, you who are seeking the Lord, in his service! Will you not in this encounter the Lord, all those who hope in their heart? For the Lord will consider the pious, and call the righteous by name, and his spirit will hover upon the poor, and he will renew the faithful with his strength. For he will honour the pious upon the throne of an eternal kingdom, freeing prisoners, giving sight to the blind, straightening out the twisted. And forever shall I cling to those who hope, and in his mercy … and the fruits of … not be delayed. And the Lord will perform marvellous acts such as have not existed, just as he said, for he will heal the badly wounded and make the dead live, he will proclaim good news to the poor and he will lead the … and enrich the hungry… and all … [4Q521 fragment 2, column II]

    John P. Meier (A Marginal Jew, III,496f) comments on the significance of this passage:

    While the direct parallels between this text and Matt 11:5 par. lie in the four saving acts of healing the wounded, giving sight to the blind, raising the dead, and the proclaiming good news to the poor, the overall context and “feel” of the two passages are surprisingly similar. These acts that heal and comfort are the fulfillment of prophecy, especially as found in the Book of Isaiah; they occur in the eschatological and/or messianic period of salvation for Israel. In each text there is an astonishing order of climax. The various miraculous acts rise in a crescendo to the announcement of the resurrection of the dead. Yet trumping even that spectacular end-time feat is the still greater act of salvation: proclaiming good news to the poor. … At the very least, 4Q521 shows that the reply of Matt 11:5 is completely intelligible in the mouth of Jesus the Jew in 1st-century Palestine and need not be assigned to the creativity of the early church.

    Underlying these prophetic visions of a time of blessing is the following passage from Isaiah 61:1-4:

    The spirit of the Lord God is upon me,
    because the Lord has anointed me;
    he has sent me to bring good news to the oppressed,
    to bind up the brokenhearted,
    to proclaim liberty to the captives,
    and release to the prisoners;
    to proclaim the year of the Lord’s favor,
    and the day of vengeance of our God;
    to comfort all who mourn;
    to provide for those who mourn in Zion–
    to give them a garland instead of ashes,
    the oil of gladness instead of mourning,
    the mantle of praise instead of a faint spirit.
    They will be called oaks of righteousness,
    the planting of the Lord, to display his glory.
    They shall build up the ancient ruins,
    they shall raise up the former devastations;
    they shall repair the ruined cities,
    the devastations of many generations.

    Blessed is the one who does not take offence

    This episode concludes with a beatitude: a typical from of address for Jesus. As with the more familiar beatitudes in Matthew 5 and Luke 6, this sayings assumes a problematic reality (poverty, hunger, grief or, in this case, disbelief) and then reverses that ambiguity so that the harsh reality becomes a point of blessing.

    While John (and all those Jews who shared his views in the first half of the 1C) might well take offence at a Messiah who neither raises an army against Rome nor calls down fire from heaven, those with eyes to see and ears to hear can discern in the transforming practice of the Kingdom communities gathered around the table of Jesus the fulfillment of the ancient hopes. Then as now the test of authentic religion is not whether our personal expectations are reinforced but whether the poor have good news preached to them.

     

     

    Jesus Database

    Liturgies and Prayers

    For liturgies and sermons each week, shaped by a progressive theology, check Rex Hunt’s web site

    Other recommended sites include:

     

    Music Suggestions

    • Come thou long expected Jesus – TiS 272
    • Funny kind of night – TiS 329
    • God has a table – TiS 544
    • The Servant King – TiS 256

    See David MacGregor’s Together to Celebrate site for recommendations from a variety of contemporary genre.

  • Second Sunday of Advent (8 December 2013)

    Contents

    Lectionary

    • Isaiah 11:1-10 and Psalm 72:1-7, 18-19
    • Romans 15:4-13
    • Matthew 3:1-12

    John the Baptist

    On the Second Sunday of Advent the figure of John the Baptizer takes central stage.

    For further information about John elsewhere in these wiki pages, see:

    John in the Jesus Tradition

    The judgments of the Jesus Seminar on various aspects of the John the Baptist tradition may be of interest. For a complete discussion of the Seminar’s views on John the Baptist, see the special report by Barnes Tatum, John the Baptist and Jesus: A report of the Jesus Seminar.

    • JBap baptized with water
    • JBap preached
    • JBap’s characteristic activities took place in the wilderness
    • JBap preached baptism
    • JBap’s baptism was a form of Jewish immersion rite
    • JBap administered baptism himself
    • JBap’s baptism was done in flowing water
    • JBap’s baptism was understood to express repentance
    • JBap’s baptism was understood to mediate God’s forgiveness
    • JBap’s baptism was understood to be a protest against the temple establishment
    • JBap’s baptism was understood to purify from uncleanness
    • JBap’s baptism was understood as an initiation into a Jewish sectarian movement
    • JBap’s baptism was understood to foreshadow an expected figure’s baptism.
    • JBap taught repentance
    • JBap taught repentance apart from baptism
    • Mark 1:4 and Matt 3:2 summarize the message of JBap
    • JBap spoke the words in Mark 1:7, Luke 3:16b and Matt 3:11b
    • JBap spoke the words in Mark 1:8, Luke 3:16a,c and Matt 3:11a,c
    • JBap spoke the words in Luke 3:17 and Matt 3:12
    • JBap spoke the words in Luke 3:7-9 and Matt 3:7-10
    • JBap spoke the words in Luke 3:11
    • JBap spoke the words in Luke 3:13
    • JBap spoke the words in Luke 3:14
    • JBap spoke the words reported in John 1:15
    • JBap spoke the words reported in John 1:23
    • JBap spoke the words reported in John 1:29
    • JBap spoke the words reported in John 1:32-34
    • JBap spoke the words reported in John 3:27-30
    • JBap’s exhortations and activities had a widespread appeal.
    • In response, people repented
    • In response, people were baptized
    • JBap had disciples
    • Pharisees came to hear JBap
    • Sadducees came to hear JBap
    • Toll collectors came to hear JBap
    • Soldiers came to hear JBap
    • JBap was part of a broader baptizing phenomenon or movement
    • JBap was an Essene
    • JBap was a member (or former member) of the Qumran community
    • JBap was a former Essene
    • JBap was a lone Jewish sage or holy man (like Bannus)
    • JBap imitated Elijah
    • JBap acted as a prophet
    • JBap was an apocalyptic preacher
    • JBap was perceived as a hellenistic moralist
    • JBap’s locale overlaps that of Jesus
    • JBap’s time overlaps that of Jesus
    • Jesus began his public ministry at the time JBap was imprisoned

    John the Baptist in the Gospel of Matthew

    GMatthew comes from late in the 1C: typically dated somewhere in the 80s and seen as reflecting to some extent the tensions as the followers of Jesus diverged from the Torah-observant Jewish neighbors in the final quarter of the first century. Matthew used Mark as a primary source for his basic narrative, supplementing that storyline with the more extensive traditions of Jesus’ teaching in the Sayings Gospel Q. As there is no reason to think that Matthew used Luke or John, this gospel may preserve a distinctive view of Jewish Christianity and of John the Baptist.

    • Unlike Luke, Matthew makes no reference to John the Baptist or his parents (Zechariah and Elizabeth) in his infancy narrative.
    • Matthew, then, does not treat Jesus and John as cousins.
    • Matthew 3:1-12 introduces John at the commencement of Jesus’ public activity:

    Verses 1-6 reconfigure the material in Mark 1:2-6,14-15. In the process, Matthew corrects Mark’s mistaken attribution of Malachi 3:1 to Isaiah and omits the words not found in Isaiah. There appears to be no significant difference in their view of John.
    Verses 7-10 draw on the Q Gospel for a brief resume of John’s message, with very similar words being found in Luke 3:7-9. Matthew does not present the instructions to special interest groups (including tax-collectors and soldiers) that we find attributed to John in Luke 3:10-14.
    Verses 11-12 portray John as the precursor who was consciously preparing the crowds for the more powerful one coming after him. Matthew supplements the tradition from Mark with a Q saying about the winnowing fork that the Coming One will wield as he separates the wheat from the chaff.

    • Where Luke immediately follows this scene with an expurgated reference to John’s death at the orders of Herod Antipas, Matthew follows the example of Mark and deals with the death of John later in the narrative (Matt 14:3-12).
    • All three Synoptic Gospels then recount the story of Jesus’ baptism by John. Matthew’s significant variation to the Markan story is to add a discourse in which Jesus re-assures John that his baptism is approprirate despite his personal virtue:

    John would have prevented him, saying,
    “I need to be baptized by you, and do you come to me?”
    But Jesus answered him, “Let it be so for now;
    for it is proper for us in this way to fulfill all righteousness.”
    Then he consented. [Matt 3:14-15]

    • The only other significant Matthean change is to clarify that “the Spirit” that descended like a dove was “the Spirit of God” (3:16).
    • John’s arrest is mentioned in Matt 4:12, closely following the information found in Mark 1:14.
    • The question about fasting (Matt 9:14-17) reflects an awareness that the practices of John’s disciples were similar to those of the Pharisees, while those of Jesus and his followers were distinctively less ascetical. Jesus’ reply implies that he is the bridegroom, while John was a figure of lesser significance.
    • John’s question to Jesus (Matt 11:2-6 = Luke 7:18-23) forms the first part of an extended discussion of the relative significance of these two figures. From his prison, John sends disciples to ask whether Jesus is “the one who is to come” or whether they should wait for another? In response Jesus cites his miracles of deliverance (for the blind, the lame, lepers, the deaf, the dead and the poor) and pronounces a beatuitude on anyone who takes no offence at him.
    • Jesus’ words about John then follow immediately (Matt 11:7-19) just as they do in Luke 7. John’s special significance is developed using the symbol of Elijah, whose return was anticipated by some Jews as a precursor to the arrival of the Messiah. Unlike Matthew, Luke avoided identifying John with Elijah since he was going to apply the motif of Elijah’s ascent to heaven and the outpouring of his spirit on Elisha to empower Elisha for ministry to the ascension of Jesus and the outpouring of the Spirit at Pentecost.
    • Herod fears Jesus is John redivivus in Matt 14:1-2 (=Mark 6:14-16 = Luke 9:7-9), and this provides Matthew with the opportunity to recount the story of John’s execution. Matthew’s version is a simpler form of the more detailed story found in Mark 6:17-29. The only point where Matthew elaborates the version found in Mark is when he adds a setence about Herod’s high regard for John:

    Though Herod wanted to put him to death,
    he feared the crowd,
    because they regarded him as a prophet. [Matt 14:5]

    • Jesus learns of John’s death in a scene that is unique to Matthew:

    Then [the disciples of John] went and told Jesus.
    Now when Jesus heard this,
    he withdrew from there in a boat to a deserted place by himself. [Matt 14:12b-13a]

    • The confession at Caesrea Philippi (Matt 16:13-23 = Mark 8:27-33 = Luke 9:18-22) includes a mention of the belief that Jesus was in some sense a resurrected John the Baptist:

    [Jesus] asked his disciples,
    “Who do people say that the Son of Man is?”
    And they said, “Some say John the Baptist,
    but others Elijah, and still others Jeremiah or one of the prophets.” [Matt 16:13b-14]

    • The interpretation of John as Elijah (already mentioned above) is the main focus of Matt 17:9-13, which follows Mark 9:9-13 but which Luke was to entirely omit for reasons already cited:

    As they were coming down the mountain, Jesus ordered them,
    “Tell no one about the vision until after the Son of Man has been raised from the dead.”
    And the disciples asked him, “Why, then, do the scribes say that Elijah must come first?”
    He replied, “Elijah is indeed coming and will restore all things;
    but I tell you that Elijah has already come, and they did not recognize him,
    but they did to him whatever they pleased.
    So also the Son of Man is about to suffer at their hands.”
    Then the disciples understood that he was speaking to them about John the Baptist.

    • John the Baptist makes a final appearance in Matthew when Jesus is questioned over the source of his authority:

    When he entered the temple, the chief priests and the elders of the people came to him as he was teaching, and said, “By what authority are you doing these things, and who gave you this authority?” Jesus said to them, “I will also ask you one question; if you tell me the answer, then I will also tell you by what authority I do these things. Did the baptism of John come from heaven, or was it of human origin?” And they argued with one another, “If we say, ‘From heaven,’ he will say to us, ‘Why then did you not believe him?’ But if we say, ‘Of human origin,’ we are afraid of the crowd; for all regard John as a prophet.” So they answered Jesus, “We do not know.” And he said to them, “Neither will I tell you by what authority I am doing these things. [Matt 21:23-27 = Mark 11:27-33 = Luke 20:1-8]

    From this brief review of the way that John the Baptist functions in Matthew’s Gospel, we can see that Matthew follows Mark more closely than Luke was to do. In Matthew, John the Baptist is clearly a figure of lesser significance. While not the subject of his own birth narratives (as in Luke), John has considerable dignity as the Elijah figure who comes to prepare for the arrival of the Coming One. The underlying unity of the Baptist and Jesus communities is reflected in the frequent references to Jesus as a resurrected John, in the assumption that they shared similar prophetic status, and in the questions over their (surprisingly?) differing attitudes to fasting.

    Jesus Database

    • 051 Into the Desert – (1) GThom. 78; (2) 2Q: Luke 7:24-27 = Matt 11:7-10; (3) Mark 1: 2-3 = Matt 3:3 = Luke 3:4-6 =(?) John 1:19-23
    • 115 Johns Message – (1a) 2Q: Luke 3:15-18= Matt 3:11-12; (1b) Acts 13:24-25; (1c) John 1:24-31; (2) Mark 1:7-8
    • 137 Johns Warning – (1) 2Q: Luke 3:7-9a = Matt 3:7-10b
    • 213 John the Baptist – (1a) Mark 1:4-6 = Matt 3:1,4-6 = Luke 3:1-3; (1b) GEbi. 2-3a
    • 214 Kingdom and Repentance – (1a) Mark 1:14-15 = Matt 4:12,17 = Luke 4:14-15 =(?) John 4:1-3; (1b) Matt 3:2

    Liturgies and Prayers

    For liturgies and sermons each week, shaped by a progressive theology, check Rex Hunt’s web site

    Other recommended sites include:

    Music Suggestions

    See David MacGregor’s Together to Celebrate site for recommendations from a variety of contemporary genre.

Exit mobile version